that makes a lot of sense from an accessibility standpoint.. but on the other hand there will probably always be a lot harsher limitations doing it that way.pango wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:56 amWell, embedded languages (also called extension languages, because when you mention "embedded" people often think about embedded systems, which is unrelated) are a known and legit abstraction method.
So from a purely software engineering perspective it's best if quest can be written in a quest domain specific language (DSL). Hopefully the quest language can be extended later to cover more needs...
but i'm not going to argue things i don't understand much about. just an uninformed opinion.