(Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:44 am
(Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
Going off the UESP Wiki, I should have received a Dwarven armor piece for promotion to Commander and a mithril piece for promotion to Marshall. I received adamantium quality followed by ebony instead. I have enough reputation points to be promoted to Paladin but do not meet the skill requirements, so it seems like my reward was based not on my actual rank, but what my rank would be based on reputation alone.
- pango
- Posts: 3359
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 6:14 pm
- Location: France
- Contact:
Re: (Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
Looking at the code, I seems it doesn't match UESP table;
Code:
Hence
vs UESP:
PS.: Hazelnut chose to base rewards upon Daggerfall Chronicles p. 98 instead of classic Daggerfall:
(But It seems classic has a much more convoluted behavior than what is described in the Chronicles, so I'm not convinced the two don't match because "they ran out of time to implement what's described in the Chronicles"; To me it looks more like they tried to restrict knightly orders benefits).
Code:
Code: Select all
ArmorMaterialTypes material = ArmorMaterialTypes.Iron + rank;
Code: Select all
rank 0 => Iron
rank 1 => Steel
rank 2 => Silver
rank 3 => Elven
rank 4 => Dwarven
rank 5 => Mithril
rank 6 => Adamantium
rank 7 => Ebony
rank 8 => Orcish
rank 9 => Daedric
PS.: Hazelnut chose to base rewards upon Daggerfall Chronicles p. 98 instead of classic Daggerfall:
If I read the code right, DFU even extends that to rank 0 and 1 with Iron and Steel armors. I think it's reasonable.[Gallant reward:] One free piece of non-magical armor per rank, starting at this rank. Pick three to six random pieces, all of the same material. Metal type is based upon rank (2=silver, 3=elven, 4=dwarven, 5=mithril, 6=adamantium, 7=ebony, 8=orcish, 9=daedric)
(But It seems classic has a much more convoluted behavior than what is described in the Chronicles, so I'm not convinced the two don't match because "they ran out of time to implement what's described in the Chronicles"; To me it looks more like they tried to restrict knightly orders benefits).
Mastodon: @pango@fosstodon.org
When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
-- Charles Goodhart
When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
-- Charles Goodhart
- Hazelnut
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: (Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
Thanks for the analysis Pango, saves me explaining which I would have done a much worse job of anyway.
This was completely intentional by me. I consider this a bugfix making DFU match the original intent, and it makes more sense in-game I think. If anyone disagrees then consider how poor rank benefits are in Knightly Orders, this makes it a bit more enticing. Failing that, feel free to not get the armour or leave it on the ground.
This was completely intentional by me. I consider this a bugfix making DFU match the original intent, and it makes more sense in-game I think. If anyone disagrees then consider how poor rank benefits are in Knightly Orders, this makes it a bit more enticing. Failing that, feel free to not get the armour or leave it on the ground.
See my mod code for examples of how to change various aspects of DFU: https://github.com/ajrb/dfunity-mods
- mikeprichard
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:49 pm
Re: (Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
FYI to Jay_H and UESP wiki fans, I've updated the relevant DFU gameplay differences page (https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Tes2Mod:Dagger ... ifferences) with this info.
- Jay_H
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 1:54 am
- Contact:
Re: (Bug?) Generous knightly order armor rewards
Brilliant, thanks mike